<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Real Estate Taxes: Short Sales and no 1099-C income</title> <atom:link href="http://ericbramlett.com/short-sales-and-no-1099-c-income/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://ericbramlett.com/short-sales-and-no-1099-c-income/</link> <description>Click here to search all Austin real estate for sale! Eric Bramlett is a full service Austin real estate broker specializing in buyer, seller, and investor representation.</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 21:25:22 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Caron</title><link>http://ericbramlett.com/short-sales-and-no-1099-c-income/#comment-12874</link> <dc:creator>Caron</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 16:52:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ericbramlett.com/?p=2180#comment-12874</guid> <description>I am currently in the process of short selling my home in AZ.  I had to move to CA in January of this year for my husbands employment, prior to the close of escrow.  This move was our cause of hardship leading us to a short sale.  Because I moved prior to the close of escrow does that prohibit me from using the &quot;primary residence&quot; exception in regards to a 1099-c tax liability?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am currently in the process of short selling my home in AZ.  I had to move to CA in January of this year for my husbands employment, prior to the close of escrow.  This move was our cause of hardship leading us to a short sale.  Because I moved prior to the close of escrow does that prohibit me from using the &#8220;primary residence&#8221; exception in regards to a 1099-c tax liability?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sandra</title><link>http://ericbramlett.com/short-sales-and-no-1099-c-income/#comment-9282</link> <dc:creator>Sandra</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:44:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ericbramlett.com/?p=2180#comment-9282</guid> <description>I had a closed short sale in July. Satisfaction says,full payment &amp; satisfaction of said note &amp; mortgage deed, and surenders the same as canceled, &amp; hereby directs the clerk of said circuit court to cancel the same of record. Does this mean I am safe from collection of twenty thousand deficiency?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a closed short sale in July.<br /> Satisfaction says,full payment &amp; satisfaction of said note &amp; mortgage deed, and surenders the same as canceled, &amp; hereby directs the clerk of said circuit court to cancel the same of record. Does this mean I am safe from collection<br /> of twenty thousand deficiency?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Michael White</title><link>http://ericbramlett.com/short-sales-and-no-1099-c-income/#comment-8670</link> <dc:creator>Michael White</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 13:57:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ericbramlett.com/?p=2180#comment-8670</guid> <description>Carolyn,Good job at being a code geek! If you read sec. 2 of HR 3648, sub section (h) specifically refers to IRC 121 in for the definition of principal residence.  There is no ambiguity here.  However if you look at IRS pub 4681 pages 7&amp;8, it is ambiguous which leads to the confusion, (trick devils!).  This is probably the source of your current CPA&#039;s position as well.  So... provided you meet the 2 of 5 year requirement by the time funds hit escrow you should be good.  If you are on the edge you may want to spend your time in Florida until the house sells.  This may actually help your ability to sell as well.Michael</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carolyn,</p><p>Good job at being a code geek! If you read sec. 2 of HR 3648, sub section (h) specifically refers to IRC 121 in for the definition of principal residence.  There is no ambiguity here.  However if you look at IRS pub 4681 pages 7&amp;8, it is ambiguous which leads to the confusion, (trick devils!).  This is probably the source of your current CPA&#8217;s position as well.  So&#8230; provided you meet the 2 of 5 year requirement by the time funds hit escrow you should be good.  If you are on the edge you may want to spend your time in Florida until the house sells.  This may actually help your ability to sell as well.</p><p>Michael</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Carolyn</title><link>http://ericbramlett.com/short-sales-and-no-1099-c-income/#comment-8661</link> <dc:creator>Carolyn</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 01:39:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ericbramlett.com/?p=2180#comment-8661</guid> <description>Michael White,I think you&#039;ve hit the nail on the head.  The confusion I&#039;m running into is the difference between COD income exclusion and capital gain exclusion. This transaction would be a nondeductible loss for me, so capital gains in not an issue.  My question is on the COD exclusion (1099-C amount).  I think it boils down to the definition of &#039;principal residence&#039;. HR 3648 says principal residence has the same meaning as used in Section 121.  Does that mean one could exclude COD income on a property that was a primary residence (or main home) in the &quot;majority of the time&quot; (for a calendar year) sense or in the &quot;2 of 5 years&quot; sense?  Remember, I&#039;m not referring to the capital gain exclusion, but only to the COD income exclusion.  If it&#039;s the &quot;majority of the time&quot;, then would an abandoned home apply if the foreclosure auction (or shortsale) happened in a period outside of that 6 mo. plus one day timeframe subsequent to the abandonment?I look forward to your reply. Again, I&#039;d very much appreciate guidance reference for your response.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael White,</p><p>I think you&#8217;ve hit the nail on the head.  The confusion I&#8217;m running into is the difference between COD income exclusion and capital gain exclusion. This transaction would be a nondeductible loss for me, so capital gains in not an issue.  My question is on the COD exclusion (1099-C amount).  I think it boils down to the definition of &#8216;principal residence&#8217;. HR 3648 says principal residence has the same meaning as used in Section 121.  Does that mean one could exclude COD income on a property that was a primary residence (or main home) in the &#8220;majority of the time&#8221; (for a calendar year) sense or in the &#8220;2 of 5 years&#8221; sense?  Remember, I&#8217;m not referring to the capital gain exclusion, but only to the COD income exclusion.  If it&#8217;s the &#8220;majority of the time&#8221;, then would an abandoned home apply if the foreclosure auction (or shortsale) happened in a period outside of that 6 mo. plus one day timeframe subsequent to the abandonment?</p><p>I look forward to your reply. Again, I&#8217;d very much appreciate guidance reference for your response.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Carolyn</title><link>http://ericbramlett.com/short-sales-and-no-1099-c-income/#comment-8659</link> <dc:creator>Carolyn</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 01:18:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ericbramlett.com/?p=2180#comment-8659</guid> <description>Michael White,Thanks for your reply.  I think you&#039;re hitting the nail on the head.  I think the confusion I&#039;m running up against is in the difference between Debt Forgiveness (COD)INCOME exclusion vs. capital gain exclusion.  I&#039;m not looking at capital gains at all as it would be a nondeductible loss for me. I&#039;m looking for the best, most conservative definition of primary residence, principal residence, main home, whatever term the IRS uses - seems they&#039;re used interchangably.  HR 3648 says it&#039;s the same meaning used in section 121. Does that mean one would be able to exclude COD from income (by submitting Form 982) (1099-C) if it were for a house that was a principal residence in the &quot;where you spend most of your time&quot; (in the calendar year) sense, or in the &quot;two out of five years&quot; sense? Remember I&#039;m not referring to capital gains.I look forward to your response. And again, if you were able to provide guidance reference, I&#039;d very much appreciate it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael White,</p><p>Thanks for your reply.  I think you&#8217;re hitting the nail on the head.  I think the confusion I&#8217;m running up against is in the difference between Debt Forgiveness (COD)INCOME exclusion vs. capital gain exclusion.  I&#8217;m not looking at capital gains at all as it would be a nondeductible loss for me. I&#8217;m looking for the best, most conservative definition of primary residence, principal residence, main home, whatever term the IRS uses &#8211; seems they&#8217;re used interchangably.  HR 3648 says it&#8217;s the same meaning used in section 121. Does that mean one would be able to exclude COD from income (by submitting Form 982) (1099-C) if it were for a house that was a principal residence in the &#8220;where you spend most of your time&#8221; (in the calendar year) sense, or in the &#8220;two out of five years&#8221; sense? Remember I&#8217;m not referring to capital gains.</p><p>I look forward to your response. And again, if you were able to provide guidance reference, I&#8217;d very much appreciate it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Michael White</title><link>http://ericbramlett.com/short-sales-and-no-1099-c-income/#comment-8655</link> <dc:creator>Michael White</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 15:59:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ericbramlett.com/?p=2180#comment-8655</guid> <description>Carolyn, If you are talking about exclusion of gain on Qualified Princiapal Residence Indebtedness, A qualified principal residence follows the same rules as for gain on the sale of a house (IRC Sec 121, primary residnece for two of the preceeding 5 year, this follow the same rules on gain from sale of primary home).  However your question is concerning something different than the original post.  Both of these a addressed on IRS form 982.  Don&#039;t hesitate to contact me if you have any questions.Michael White</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carolyn,<br /> If you are talking about exclusion of gain on Qualified Princiapal Residence Indebtedness, A qualified principal residence follows the same rules as for gain on the sale of a house (IRC Sec 121, primary residnece for two of the preceeding 5 year, this follow the same rules on gain from sale of primary home).  However your question is concerning something different than the original post.  Both of these a addressed on IRS form 982.  Don&#8217;t hesitate to contact me if you have any questions.</p><p>Michael White</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mike</title><link>http://ericbramlett.com/short-sales-and-no-1099-c-income/#comment-8647</link> <dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 17:42:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ericbramlett.com/?p=2180#comment-8647</guid> <description>Carolyn, standard disclaimer that I&#039;m not an attorney or tax professional.Therefore, please ask your attorney.My understanding is that while the property is in your name with homestead exemption, it is regarded as your primary residence.Seems to me the property you&#039;re asking about is (was) a primary.Please let me know what your (an) attorney says.I try to post updated foreclosure prevention information @ &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sarasotahomesforsalenow.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Sarasota Real Estate &#124; Sarasota Foreclosures&lt;/a&gt;Mike</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carolyn, standard disclaimer that I&#8217;m not an attorney or tax professional.</p><p>Therefore, please ask your attorney.</p><p>My understanding is that while the property is in your name with homestead exemption, it is regarded as your primary residence.</p><p>Seems to me the property you&#8217;re asking about is (was) a primary.</p><p>Please let me know what your (an) attorney says.</p><p>I try to post updated foreclosure prevention information @ <a href="http://www.sarasotahomesforsalenow.com" rel="nofollow">Sarasota Real Estate | Sarasota Foreclosures</a></p><p>Mike</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Carolyn</title><link>http://ericbramlett.com/short-sales-and-no-1099-c-income/#comment-8644</link> <dc:creator>Carolyn</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 13:55:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ericbramlett.com/?p=2180#comment-8644</guid> <description>I should have qualified it....I&#039;m referring to both deficiency forgiveness and to the IRS income tax exclusion.Thanks.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should have qualified it&#8230;.I&#8217;m referring to both deficiency forgiveness and to the IRS income tax exclusion.</p><p>Thanks.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Carolyn</title><link>http://ericbramlett.com/short-sales-and-no-1099-c-income/#comment-8643</link> <dc:creator>Carolyn</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 13:51:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ericbramlett.com/?p=2180#comment-8643</guid> <description>Mike,Does &#039;owner occupied&#039; mean owner occupied at the time the sale closes?  What if I moved away from my principal residence and it was many months before the short sale or auction sale took place? Please let me know where I can find guidance on your reply.Thanks.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike,</p><p>Does &#8216;owner occupied&#8217; mean owner occupied at the time the sale closes?  What if I moved away from my principal residence and it was many months before the short sale or auction sale took place? Please let me know where I can find guidance on your reply.</p><p>Thanks.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mike</title><link>http://ericbramlett.com/short-sales-and-no-1099-c-income/#comment-8582</link> <dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 15:54:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ericbramlett.com/?p=2180#comment-8582</guid> <description>Congratulations, Christopher.Primary vs &quot;investment&quot; is important distinction - totally different rules/strategies apply.Regarding buying again, Fannie Mae has revised guidelines for buying after short sale, deed in lieu or foreclosure:**Look at the down payment requirements**Fannie Mae issues changes the Waiting Period After a Short-Sale or Deed-in-Lieu of Foreclosure:* Deed-In-Lieu of Foreclosure o Current waiting period - 4 years with additional requirements after 4 years for up to 7 years o New waiting period - 2 years for 80 percent LTV (loan to value) mortgage, 4 years for 90 percent LTV and 7 years for higher LTV&#039;s * Short-Sale o Current waiting period - 2 years o New waiting period - 2 years for 80 percent LTV (loan to value) mortgage, 4 years for 90 percent LTV and 7 years for higher LTV&#039;sWith &quot;extenuating circumstances&quot; that caused the need for the short-sale or deed-in-lieu, different guidelines apply according to Fannie Mae:* Deed-In-Lieu of Foreclosure o Current waiting period - 2 years with additional requirements after 2 years for up to 7 years o New waiting period - 2 years for 00 percent LTV (loan to value) mortgage. * Short-Sale o Current waiting period - same as above, no exceptions currently. o New waiting period - 2 years for 90 percent LTV (loan to value) mortgage.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations, Christopher.</p><p>Primary vs &#8220;investment&#8221; is important distinction &#8211; totally different rules/strategies apply.</p><p>Regarding buying again, Fannie Mae has revised guidelines for buying after short sale, deed in lieu or foreclosure:</p><p>**Look at the down payment requirements**</p><p>Fannie Mae issues changes the Waiting Period After a Short-Sale or Deed-in-Lieu of Foreclosure:</p><p> * Deed-In-Lieu of Foreclosure<br /> o Current waiting period &#8211; 4 years with additional requirements after 4 years for up to 7 years<br /> o New waiting period &#8211; 2 years for 80 percent LTV (loan to value) mortgage, 4 years for 90 percent LTV and 7 years for higher LTV&#8217;s<br /> * Short-Sale<br /> o Current waiting period &#8211; 2 years<br /> o New waiting period &#8211; 2 years for 80 percent LTV (loan to value) mortgage, 4 years for 90 percent LTV and 7 years for higher LTV&#8217;s</p><p>With &#8220;extenuating circumstances&#8221; that caused the need for the short-sale or deed-in-lieu, different guidelines apply according to Fannie Mae:</p><p> * Deed-In-Lieu of Foreclosure<br /> o Current waiting period &#8211; 2 years with additional requirements after 2 years for up to 7 years<br /> o New waiting period &#8211; 2 years for 00 percent LTV (loan to value) mortgage.<br /> * Short-Sale<br /> o Current waiting period &#8211; same as above, no exceptions currently.<br /> o New waiting period &#8211; 2 years for 90 percent LTV (loan to value) mortgage.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 4/6 queries in 0.009 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 534/539 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: ericbramlett.s3.amazonaws.com

Served from: ericbramlett.com @ 2012-02-08 10:22:59 -->
