Austin Real Estate Statistics 2006 to 2010

I typically run end of the year statistics around this time of the year.  This year, I was curious to see how Austin has performed since 2006 (arguably the start of Austin’s real estate boom) through 2008 (arguably the peak) through 2010 (arguably the end of the recession.)  I expected to see numbers that showed neither the Chicken Littles (the sky is falling!) nor the Real Estate Cheerleaders (most agents) were correct.  I expected to see a gradual decline in volume & price, with a very slight uptick in pricing in 2010.  The numbers were pretty contradictory. First, all the numbers (you can click to expand.)

The first thing I noticed is the total units sold.  This number is way, way down (almost 35%.)

So it looks like the sky actually is falling.  The next set of numbers indicates roughly the same thing.  Total sales volume is also way down – almost 30%.

However, if the # of units sold is down by 35% and sold volume is down by 30%, then it indicates that prices have actually gone up.  If we look at average sold price, we see they’ve increased by just under 7% since 2006, with a decent dip in 2009/2010.

Many people don’t like to look at average sold price, but prefer to look at median.  If you look at median, the price flux is toned down, but price is still up by almost 10%.

So median sold price is up with a dip in 2009.  Many people consider median sold price/s.f. the best metric.  If we look at this, we’re still up by almost 5%, but down slightly since 2007.

So who’s right – the Cheerleaders or the Chicken Littles?  In my opinion, both are right, and both are wrong.

5 Responses

Join the
Conversation
January 21, 2011

Are your figures inflation adjusted? If not, the prices have acually been flat or declined.

Have average wages gone up or down the last five years?

January 22, 2011

No, I didn’t adjust them for inflation. Why don’t you do that for us and report back? Maybe you could cross reference it with median salary in Austin. I’d love to see what the numbers look like!

January 28, 2011

It would be interesting to see how it looks with inflation added in. I will have to look at these numbers for my area.

January 28, 2011

Adding inflation in is definitely interesting to look at relative performance of different investments over the long term, but all it does here is strengthen the real estate bears’ argument. When someone bearish on the RE market – ron for example – sees #s that show the market isn’t so bad, and is actually ticking upwards (in Austin, at least) it’s their first reaction to say, “Yeah, but…”

The question I have is this: Do you see any short term metrics reported with inflation built in? When they report the DOW trend over 5 years, do they build in inflation? Commodities over the short term? So, adding inflation to the equation is actually disingenuous – it makes the numbers look worse relative to other investments, when the other investments don’t have the same variable built in.

February 5, 2011

Your charts are quite informative and show a stronger real estate market for Austin relative to many other areas of the USA from what I’ve seen.

A quick jump over to inflationdata.com suggests that 2006 to 2008 were inflationary years, while 2009 saw deflation, then inflation again in 2010.

Interesting but, I think the comparison to real estate statistics from other cities across the nation is more revealing and relevant.

Leave a comment

Name *

Email address *

Website

Your comment *